As a writer of historical mysteries, I try to remain loyal to the details of the historical period I’m portraying. I use real settings with real characters, then insert fictitious characters with fictitious events to create the mystery.
Staying true to the facts of the historical period is fairly straightforward . . . until those facts change. You may wonder how historical facts can change. After all, they happened in the past and they’ve been documented. But historical facts can be altered based on new research and evidence.
So, what’s a writer to do? Case in point. My novel, Pure Lies, begins with a prologue in 1692, Salem, Massachusetts, where several witches are about to be hung. It was initially believed that they were hung from a tree atop Gallows Hill. In the last few weeks, we’ve come to learn that the hangings took place, not at the top of the hill, but at the bottom, on something called Proctor’s Ledge. Oh well, you think. Top, bottom, so what? Proctor’s Ledge is now the site of a Walgreens pharmacy. (Methinks there’s marketing opportunity here at Halloween!)
Interestingly enough, this actual site was pinpointed nearly a century ago, but research was lost to time and replaced by legends and misconceptions. Eventually the top of Gallows Hill became the “factual place of the hangings.” If I had known, might I have written the hangings onto the Ledge? Maybe. The location is not nearly as romantic as the hanging tree at the top of Gallows Hill.
There have been other examples of history changing over time. For centuries we believed Pluto to be our outermost planet. Now it’s been downgraded to a dwarf planet and is one of 40 other dwarf planets. A bit of a disappointment for Planet 9.
One transformation that particularly bothered me was the reclassification of the most iconic of dinosaurs, the Brontosaurus, or “thunder lizard.” Since 1903, the scientific community has believed that the genus Brontosaurus was really the Apatosaurus. Now, after serious research, paleontologists provide conclusive evidence that the Brontosaurus is distinct from the Apatosaurus and has been reinstated as its own unique genus. Yippee!
And then there’s the case of the 15th century king, Richard III, whose portrayal in both English history and English literature has created ongoing debate. It was long thought that he died in ignominy and was buried in a crude grave in an unknown location. However, in 2012, archaeologists discovered his remains under a parking lot (not a Walgreens) and through forensic analysis learned that he suffered 11 injuries at or near the time of his death, indicating he died in battle. More to come, no doubt, as further analysis is done.
History is a dynamic and ever-changing discipline. As a novelist, fortunately, I can invoke artistic license and save myself the trouble of re-writing my books to conform to changing history. Whew.
Good insight… historical novels need enough truth to keep it all plausible.
I wonder if in the future anyone will believe a story of a presidential election where a billionaire beats a field of political experts to win a nomination. Some of us can’t believe it now.
One small thing. The correct tense of “to hang” is “hanged” when referring to the act of execution. To be hanged, were hanged, etc.
Thanks, Kevin. I agree with you on the politics. Yikes, what are people thinking? As far as hang, I looked it up and hung can be used in this case. I think hanged does sound better, however.
Usage Discussion of hang
For both transitive and intransitive senses 1b the past and past participle hung, as well as hanged, is standard. Hanged is most appropriate for official executions but hung is also used . Hung is more appropriate for less formal hangings . Point conceded!
Thanks for checking, Kevin. That’s one of those tricky verbs that can go two ways. I guess the witches hangings were less formal. Ha!
I’ve always felt the same way about the Brontosaurus as I’ve felt about Pluto: No matter what they say, they’ll never be downgraded in my mind!
Yay. Thanks, Mark.
Good points, Lynne. And if we knew how much of our ‘history’ has been re-written to suit the victors over the years we’d all cringe. But, I too was so happy to see the Brontosaurus reinstated to former glory! :0)
Me too. Thanks, Indy.
Hanged not hung. One of the joys and challenges I have is finding accurate names for things in use at the time. In my novel Down The River set in Kentucky in 1813 I needed to describe the enclosure where animals were kept. Corral? Nope. That’s a Spanish word that did not hit English until decades later. I came up with “pen” and “fold” and other terms.
The Oxford English Dictionary is available online through most local libraries with your library card. You can see the earliest known use of a term and decide if that is what was used in your story.
You are correct, David. Hanged is for people; hung is for paintings. Thanks.
Hi webmaster, i’ve been reading your posts for some time and I
really like coming back here. I can see that you probably
don’t make money on your page. I know one
interesting method of earning money, I think you will like it.
Search google for: dracko’s tricks
Thanks for your suggestion. I will check out, although I’m more interested in selling books than blogs.