152 years ago next month the brutal battle at Gettysburg was fought. In only three days, 51,000 men were killed, wounded or gone missing; 5,000 horses were slaughtered on the battlefield.
I visited Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, to gather details for my book, Time Exposure. I roamed the sites of its bloody history, Cemetery Ridge, Devils Den, Big Round Top, Little Round Top. The excursion provided me with background elements to set the scene. But it also elicited dark, yet poignant emotions to help me paint the picture of the grim aftermath.
I used the technique of letters and diary entries to bring out the human side of the Civil War. I excerpt here a letter from my fictional Civil War photographer, Joseph Thornhill, to the love of his life, Sara Kelly. All other characters and events are real history. This letter might well have been written at the time.
July 3, 1863
My Dearest Sara,
I felt I had to write you today, after three of the bloodiest days I have ever witnessed. I must get it off my mind, and I might not even post this letter, lest you be terribly offended. But I feel I must unburden myself somehow.
Rumors have it that General Robert E. Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia suffered great losses, maybe one third of their forces dead, wounded or captured. The Union Army is said to have lost a good deal, maybe one quarter of their troops, but it is safe to say we won the battle of Gettysburg. Lee’s army is retreating back to the South and Mead’s men are elated. Finally, victory, and an important one.
It is sad to think that this particular battle may have been fought over something as simple as shoes. There was rumored to be a large supply of shoes in the town of Gettysburg and on July 1 an officer under Ewell’s command led his men there to confiscate these shoes. Unfortunately for them, they ran into the Union Army.
I was slightly wounded today, some shrapnel lacerating my arm. But don’t worry. The doctors have bandaged me up and say I will be fine, no permanent damage, and I take a bit of laudanum for the pain. Luckily my camera, which was caught in the crossfire suffered no harm.
I must admit that until now I had no real concept of the power our modern weaponry wields. The force of the injury knocked me clean off my feet. I think this experience will prove useful to me in my work.
The wound has not stopped me from working, however, although it is a bit difficult with one arm in a brace. I rely on my apprentice more. I’ve been busy photographing the town and its people. Now I’ll begin, once again, to shoot the battlefield remains. I am steeling myself to this task slowly, but have not made much progress.
Both Alex and Tim O’Sullivan–you remember, I mentioned this fine young man and competent photographer to you–will arrive in the next few days. I look forward to working with them.
Now, other gruesome scenes await my camera. Embalming surgeons, as they call themselves, have arrived. Although many of the dead soldiers are hastily buried where they fall, many end up in mass graves. Some are later exhumed and buried in military cemeteries, whether they’ve been identified or not– often with the headstone reading only: “A Union Soldier” or “A Confederate Soldier.” It is hard to imagine–dying in the name of one’s country but that country not even knowing your name.
On a lighter note, I have also photographed some of the Union soldiers and officers after the final skirmish, and they were truly in high spirits–dirty, sweaty, exhausted, some wounded, but all euphoric. There was optimism in the air and hope, hope that this war would soon end. But for now we must deal with the brutal aftermath of this battle. Hospital tents crowd the countryside and the small population of Gettysburg is inundated with the sick and wounded. I doubt this town will ever be the same.
Tomorrow is July 4. I wonder if anyone, in the midst of all this furor, will appreciate the irony that this day marks the eighty-seventh year of our nation’s birth.
I miss you, my dearest, and long to see you this Christmas. You are always in my thoughts as I pray I am in yours.
Yours ever truly,
Joseph
While letter or diary writing is a device to take the reader back in time, it is an opportunity for the writer to truly bring the past alive. All ideas welcome.
Hi Lynne,
Frankly, I have mixed feelings about your letter. I do agree with the mechanisms, but I find the letter too smart, too well-written, not really fitting with the photographer and situation. I have English as second language so I can be fully wrong. It’s a feeling, mostly.
He is wounded and it’s worse than he wants to say, yet he speaks about it. I see what you intend to do, but to me it’s not sufficiently subtle. I think if you hide it more, yet with a single hint point to it, the letter will hurt more, will provoke a stronger emo response from your reader. (E.g., only give the mitella-detail). Of course I don’t know if this makes sense, if it fits the character, etc.
From another angle, I think the letter can be stronger if you focus on John’s perceptions, rather than on facts. E.g., give him doubts, let him show angriness on the war’s silliness, let him condemn the politicians. Let him say, for instance, that he shot pictures so grimly that they cannot be used in the news paper (he threw up, e.g).
Just some thoughts. Hope they are of use. I fully recognize that commenting is much easier than doing it myself.
Thank you, Leonardo, for your thoroughness in reading and commenting on the letter. In many ways you are right. When I wrote the letter, I had done a lot of research into Civil War letters and diaries. Many were very similar to the tone of my letter. People in the 1860s were actually quite formal in their writing and didn’t always express their emotions. Plus, in this case, Joseph did not want to to unduly upset Sara. There are other letters in Time Exposure that do express more anger and frustration and certainly Joseph’s diary does, but this is just one letter I happened to pick. As always, thanks so much for your thoughts.
I see where you come from. It’s a trade off between being accurate historically and provoking an emotional response from your reader. My guess is the latter has more merit from a reader entertainment viewpoint, but it’s of course your story. Moreover, I have to suppress my final judgment, as I don’t know your character as well as you do. Please see my remarks in the light of getting you sharper, Lynne, not as criticizing your writing labor!
I welcome criticism, Leonardo. It helps me become a better writer. Gets me thinking, too, so please, just be honest. I appreciate it.
Very good idea on the letter. I will agree with the previous comment. But keep the style in the 19th Century.
Thanks very much, Louis.