The cover of a book is a promise to the reader.  This book is about  . . .    Will the book deliver?

At the risk of hurting some feelings, I wanted to open this topic for discussion.  I’ve posted what I consider good and bad book covers.  The criteria I use:

  1. It gets your attention- very important as a first step in buying a book.
  2. It is tastefully done. By this I mean it is not too busy with elements fighting each other for the eye.  It uses pleasing colors and designs.  Or it knocks your socks off.
  3. It is relevant and authentic to the title, or at least to the topic of the book. Nothing like a historical novel about Queen Elizabeth with costumes from the wrong time period on the cover.
  4. The title and author name don’t overpower the art. This may be just my own pet peeve- but I hate to see half the cover wasted on the author’s name.  So it’s Stephen King, big deal.  Notice, however, I use one of his books as an example of a good cover.  After all, King’s name sells.

By the same criteria, bad book covers have none of the above, or a mishmash of all or none.  So here are the ones I consider good.

great covers 3great book coversgreat covers 2

good covers 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here are the ones I consider not so good.

bad covers 2bad covers 4bad book covers 3

bad covers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How do you feel about these?  What are your criteria?

Here are my book covers.  How do they rate in your estimate?

Kennedy Deadly Provenance

KENNEDY_PURE LIESKennedy_Time ExposureKennedy_The Triangle