Lost Art: Another Tragic Legacy of the Third Reich

“The transfer of works of art from vanquished to victor is as old as warfare itself.”

. . . Lynn Nicolas, author of Rape of Europa

I open with this quote because it so aptly describes the events that began in the art world long before the outbreak of the second World War.  Hitler’s dream of a pure Germanic Empire included works of art and he determinedly set about purging those pieces he considered unsuitable.

Entartete Kunst queue 2What was unsuitable?  Works that were “unfinished” or abstract, that did not depict reality.  Vasily Kandinsky.  Works by Jews. Camille Pisarro.  Works by leftists.  George Grosz.  Degenerate art they were called and exhibitions of them were set up to show the German people what not to like and admire.  Shows like “Entartete Kunst” in Munich in 1937 drew thousands.

Hermann Goering was one of the first in Hitler’s regime to recognize the commercial value of some of these works of art and amassed thousands of works for his own personal collection.   His “agent” took Van Gogh’s “Portrait of Dr. Gachet,” purged from a museum in Frankfurt, to sell in Holland.  The painting eventually found its way to New York and was sold for $82.5 million.

Alfred Rosenberg, a Nazi ideologue, set up the ERR, the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg, to systematically collect – confiscate or steal, to be more precise – works of art and artifacts from state museums, citizens and Jews, in particular.  Millions of pieces.

As the war came to an end, the Allies closed in.  With them were a handful of art-specialists called “monument men.”  Their job was to locate and salvage these precious works of art from Germany, Italy and France.  Every day these officers would find thousands of pieces on the verge of destruction.  They saved what they could; still many disappeared through looting.

Vase with OleandersThe fate of thousands of objects is still unknown, even today.  One of those precious pieces is the subject of my book, Deadly Provenance.  It is Van Gogh’s painting, “Still Life: Vase with Oleanders,” which vanished in 1944.  Was it destroyed or is it hidden in someone’s secret art collection?  In someone’s garage waiting for a sale, perhaps?  Will it ever surface to please the world once more?

Can science and technology assist in authenticating the painting if ever it is found?  And if so, will it be restored to its rightful owner?  Provenance will tell.

For those interested, I will be speaking in depth about this topic and my book at the Bowers Museum in Santa Ana, CA, on Saturday, March 28 at 1:30 p.m.  http://www.bowers.org/index.php/programs/lectures/event/2186-lecture-book-signing-deadly-provenance

 

 

Lost Manuscript Discovered

manuscriptFirst Harper Lee, then Dr. Seuss, now Lynne Kennedy.  A manuscript lost since 1985 has re-surfaced.  “Time Lapse,” an apt name for a missing manuscript has been unearthed by author Lynne Kennedy’s Labrador retriever, Rosie, in an old steamer trunk, buried in storage.

With the success of Kennedy’s mysteries, this is a valuable find.  Her high-concept novels, historical mysteries that are solved today with modern technology, have become increasingly popular with the mystery and history set.  “Time Lapse,” a follow-up to successful “Time Exposure” will pursue a character across the pond to England in the 1880s and will resolve the long-time, infamous mystery of Jack the Ripper.

How does she do it?  Research, resourcefulness and imagination.  A winning combination for any writer.  Let’s hope she polishes the original manuscript with her usual skillful style and publishes it quickly.  Fans are already clamoring for a new work.

Keep a watchful eye for “Time Lapse.”

This is Writing

Forgive the long blog, but I wanted to share an interview I did with the editor of a London newsletter called “This is Writing.”  I hope you enjoy and check out other author interviews on this link:  http://thisiswriting.com/category/author-interviews/

Scotland0003 Introduce yourself to our readers

I’m a native New Yorker but have lived more recently in Southern California. With a Master’s Degree in Science, I’ve had the privilege to be a science museum director for many years.  It was in this position that I became immersed in the world of art and history as well as science. I’ve long been a history enthusiast and mystery fan, so there was no doubt in my mind that one day I would join these forces together and become a storyteller.

How would you describe your writing style?

Eclectic.  A mix of authentic history with bizarre and twisty mystery elements. And all resolved with modern-day science.  In terms of “style” I’d say somewhere between an airplane read and a Oprah pick.

What is a typical day for you as a writer?

There is no typical day.  I’ve given up trying to organize my day into “writing times.”  I write whenever I feel motivated, usually mornings and early evenings.  Not very structured, I’m afraid.

Why did you become a writer?

These crazy plots kept popping into my head.  What if the horrific fire at the Triangle Factory in New York City in 1911 was really a cover-up for a murder?  What if greed was the real motivation for the Salem Witch Trials?  What if I could track down a real missing Van Gogh painting stolen by the Nazis during WWII?  I developed these plots through historic research and actual visitation to places involved.  Then I used my science background to solve the mysteries years, or centuries later through forensics and digital photography.

How would you describe your books?

Historical mysteries solved by modern technology.  My novels take you back in time to real events in history, but with a fictitious murder or two added to complement the story. As mentioned in previous question, the real twist comes in solving the mystery years, or centuries, later, in contemporary times with modern technology.

The time periods and places vary, from the Eastern Theater of the Civil War, to early 20th Century New York City, from Nazi Germany during World War II to the 1692 witch trials in Salem, Massachusetts. My historic characters are fictitious, both protagonists and antagonists, but they are surrounded by real people who lived at the time. I don’t make the pretense that my work is non-fiction, but I’m adamant about the backstory being as authentic as possible. My modern characters are, likewise, fictitious, and are often a blend of real people I know and love    . . . or not.

To be sure, my books are not “time travel,” “fantasy,” or “sci fi,” but rather are written in two different time periods. They are not “historical” mysteries, nor are they simply “contemporary.” What are they, then? That’s up to you to decide. Hopefully, you’ll enjoy doing so!

What was it like to win The Rocky Mountain Fiction Writers Mystery Category Award for The Triangle Murders?

A surprise.  I had entered several manuscripts before and always got good feedback, but never thought I’d actually win.  Very gratifying.  Writers always need to be validated.  Maybe not just writers?

What are you working on at the moment?

A new concept revolving around the lost colony of Roanoke, North Carolina.  When Sir Walter Raleigh sent a group of English men, along with several women and children to the new world in 1587, left them for supplies and returned three years later to find all 120 or so had vanished.  There’s been some new discoveries into what may have happened to them through archaeology, anthropology and climate research, of all things.  The modern story will be a bit of a departure for me and border on fantasy or mind-travel, of sorts.  That’s all I can say right now.

Where does the inspiration for your characters come from?

I think my characters are all amalgams of people I know and read about.  I also glom onto movie characters that are interesting and sometimes model a character after them.  But only partially.  I always add my own elements so they don’t seem cookie cutter.

How do you make sure that your plot is always compelling?

I try to build tension and suspense with each chapter, hopefully each scene. I want the readers to turn the page, particularly at the end of a scene or chapter. In terms of a compelling plot, I develop a story that is intriguing to me, such as the Nazi confiscation of art and a missing Van Gogh painting.  That’s what compels me to write.  And what, hopefully, compels readers to read.

What books have inspired you as a writer?

This may sound strange, but it was an American Western novel that jump-started me into writing.  “Lonesome Dove” by Larry McMurtry.  It’s weird.  I never read Westerns, but my husband had just read it and when I asked if I would like it, he said.  “Nah, it’s kind of a guy’s book.”  Well, I read it and loved it so much, I read it again years later and loved it even more.  It wasn’t a mystery and probably not even true to history.  But I was riveted by the story line, the characters, the settings, and the atmosphere.  I have no idea why I thought I could write something like that.  But here I am . . . still striving to write something like that.

What advice would you give aspiring novelists?

If you expect to make money or become a famous novelist on the best seller list, think carefully about writing as a career.  If you just love to write, to tell stories, develop characters and plots, then go for it.  Just toughen up your skin, learn to take criticism (go to a regular critique group) and be prepared for frustration and disappointment.  Sorry to be negative, but it’s a hard business these days.  Also be prepared – and learn to — market your work.

On the other hand, writers are a special breed.  Persistent, perseverant and obstinate.  You may be the lucky one who breaks through.  The writing, itself, is what makes you happy, and really, isn’t that what it’s all about?

 

 

Can Book Signings Really Help Sell Books?

I was contacted recently by Scott Mullins, an Australian transplanted to London, a writer, and editor of a Newsletter called “This is Writing.” He asked me to interview, which I did and that interview will appear next week. But he also asked me to write a brief article on how I felt about book signings and author lectures. I hope you will enjoy both my short feature below and also the newsletter from the UK.

writing “Writing, editing and getting a book published is a battle within itself, but what happens after that. Whether you go down the traditional publishing route or self-publish, the promotion of a book these days is widely left to the author. Events such as book signings and author lectures are seen as a great way to put yourself in front of potential readers, but what are the other benefits. Mystery writer Lynne Kennedy, who I recently interviewed (coming out February 13th), provides insight into the advantages of author lectures and books signings.”
_____________________________________________________________
There are several obvious benefits to authors for presenting lectures and participating on panels to various audiences. First, of course, they can sell their books, particularly if a book signing follows. The big question is, is it worth the time and effort to do so? Are enough books sold?

I would have to say no. Unless you’re a huge bestselling author, don’t expect to sell many books. Add to this the fact that many readers today don’t buy hard copies as often, and I haven’t found a way to sign a Kindle yet.

Having said that, one really good reason to give talks, etc. is word of mouth. If you are a practiced and entertaining speaker, the members of the audience will spread the word. After all, if you can speak well, surely you can write well. Right?

But the real reason for presenting is not what you’d suspect. It’s not for the audience, it’s for the author. I find that I learn so much more about my subject matter than I did when I initially wrote the book. Often new developments crop up that can be included. For instance, the back story of my book, Deadly Provenance, was World War II and art stolen by the Nazis. However, today new art is being uncovered almost weekly and repatriated to its original owners. Battles are ongoing even 70 years after the War between museums, collectors, dealers and heirs of original owners. I am continually learning more about the subject of my book.

In fact, as I write this, I‘ve just received two Google alerts: one about an art recovery group launching a new database tomorrow for lost, stolen and disputed artworks. A second about a new center for lost art opening in Magdeburg, Germany. Can’t wait to research my missing Van Gogh!

For me, this is clearly the biggest benefit of speaker engagements.

Book Reviews That Make You Laugh . . . or Cry

laugh cryEvery so often I visit my book pages on Amazon to see if any new reviews have come in.  Some of the initial reviews were family and friends, of course, so I knew they’d be pretty positive.  But when the new reader reviews started coming in, I was fascinated.  Some were funny, some not so.

Just as in writing a book, writing a review reveals a glimpse into the writer’s true identity — on which side of the political aisle s/he stands.  How s/he feels about love, hate, money, ethnicity, religion, values and much more.   I learned something from all of them so I decided to share a few with you.

TIME EXPOSURE- 3 stars: 

“I’ve read worse books. Enjoyed some of the historical descriptions of uniforms and photographic advancements used during the Civil War.

Author reveals her irrational fear of guns, in true ivory tower northern liberal style. She cannot seem to fathom that fighting a war to save our Union was worth the sacrifice. She seems to think it was some sort of small misunderstanding and that the war was a way for the rich to get richer. I think the most illogical theory was that it was bad of a Union gun supplier to sell faulty guns to the Confederate. That was actually a great strategy which we should consider using today. How great it would be to give all Qaeda guns that blew up in their own hands. Like I said, serious anti-gun liberal.”

Love this first line!  I don’t know where he got the notion I have an irrational fear of guns.  Seems like a tough place to be in for a mystery writer.

DEADLY PROVENANCE- 5 stars:

“Deadly Provenance is the third book I’ve read by Ms. Kennedy and I am a RAVING FAN. The language is intelligent & colorful; downright “cheeky” when the timing is right, making for an enlightening and fun read. The smart dialog compliments intriguing characters that are human – accessible and credible. The plot is complex enough to keep me enthralled, eagerly winding my way through the maze of well researched fact and deftly organized fiction. I turn the last page smarter than when I started, longing for more. PLEASE, bring on the fourth book soon. Thank you for the excellent read.”

I’d love more of these, wouldn’t you?  Honest, I don’t know this person.  But I’d like to.

THE TRIANGLE MURDERS- 4 stars:

”This is an interesting combination of mysteries. Frank and his family are great characters and I like the tie to the Triangle Factory fire. One question is left hanging: what happened to Fiona’s murderer? There is also a small discrepancy where one character is labeled first a great grandson and later a grandson. The dialogue in the historical sections is a little stilted but not bad. All in all, a very good read.”

Aha.  Stilted dialogue.  I always worry about this.

PURE LIES- 5 stars:

“I am a history buff and really enjoyed Kennedy’s latest work. For me it was part Arthur Miller’s “Crucible” and part classic murder mystery. Maggie Thornhill was a difficult character to like at first, but she grew on me; Felicity Dale was easier to like. I respect Kennedy’s attention to historical detail and her ability to make it interesting and intriguing. We should all pay close attention to underlying message in the book as it relates to modern society. I’m looking forward to Lynne Kennedy’s next book.”

More, more!

I urge you to check out your own book reviews from time to time.  What did you learn?  Share them with us.